Criteria for choosing a team’s project management tool

A friend asked, so I sketched a rough list of the cri­te­ria I’d use today to choose a project man­age­ment app for a company. I should say the list is incom­plete, but I think it can be useful as a start­ing point for anyone choos­ing a task manager.

My expe­ri­ence isn’t universal. Over the years I’ve used a fair pile of tools for orga­niz­ing team­work: from simple task man­agers like Teamer and Trello to sophis­ti­cated builders like Planfix and Podio. Admittedly, my expe­ri­ence is lim­ited in that I was always the boss, and I could break any resis­tance and dis­con­tent by force of author­ity rather than persuasion. I sus­pect that bring­ing in a task man­ager after work­ing in chats and Google Sheets can meet much more resis­tance from a team. My employ­ees hate Planfix too, but they have to put up with it.

One more con­sid­er­a­tion before the criteria. If there were a con­ve­nient tailor-made solu­tion for my indus­try, I’d rather choose that. For instance, we process our online store’s orders in Brightpearl, because it’s a spe­cial­ized e-commerce solution. If there are solu­tions like that for your field, look at them first. Now, my criteria.

Multitasking. The abil­ity to build processes and manage projects in one place.

Flexibility. Task and process tem­plates, or some­thing similar. Very fine-grained access settings.

What do I do now? It should be easy for every employee to answer the ques­tion “What should I do today?” An exam­ple: an employee has sev­eral work boards in Trello. To under­stand what to do, they have to go through all of them and copy the tasks into their per­sonal task manager. That’s why I gave up on Trello.

A human interface. Try it your­self and see what’s con­ve­nient and what isn’t. In Airtable, the extra rows you keep cre­at­ing by acci­dent are really annoying.

The system’s hard limits. Airtable limits how long it keeps the his­tory of changes to cards and the com­ments on them. That’s shit, if you ask me. Three years ago we dis­cussed an idea ⟶ now we’ve come back to it, and no dice, the con­ver­sa­tion is gone. We might as well have dis­cussed it on Telegram. Other exam­ples: boards that aren’t linked to each other in Trello, and access set at the work­space level in Podio.

The prod­uct’s age. A new prod­uct can be shut down quickly if it doesn’t take off. I once built a train­ing base on an Airtable looka­like, and it was shut down a year later.

A well-developed API for integrations. There’s an exam­ple of an inte­gra­tion on my Facebook.

The prod­uct is actively devel­oped by its team. Brightpearl, for exam­ple, isn’t.

Price per user. The very last cri­te­rion, because a team’s pro­duc­tiv­ity can vary by a factor of ten or more, and the envi­ron­ment for man­ag­ing tasks has a big effect on that.