Why people tend to switch task management systems so often

People usu­ally don’t do enough main­te­nance on their task list, which leaves it overburdened. Old unfin­ished work, raw ideas that aren’t tasks but more like puz­zles to solve. (What did I mean by that?) Tasks you don’t really want to do, or hon­estly lack the energy to do now.

Setting up a new system feels more pro­duc­tive than doing that maintenance. The former results in a clean, shiny new system, while the latter doesn’t give such a clearly vis­i­ble result.

Doing main­te­nance involves making hard choices. You have to face your own lim­i­ta­tions as you decide whether each stale task should be put off or discarded. Doing it all at once, by declar­ing your system bank­rupt, feels easier.

Poorly for­mu­lated tasks feel overwhelming. Just look­ing at them invites a panic attack, and we usu­ally suc­cumb to pro­cras­ti­na­tion to rescue ourselves. Correctly named tasks feel like “Why would I even write it down? It’s so quick and easy!”

No, it’s not quick and easy, but you don’t know that, and you never ever learn to cor­rect this under­es­ti­ma­tion bias.

Again. A good task list looks as if you’ve put more work into com­pil­ing it than into doing the work itself. Too much work, they say. And then they go back to their usual road-to-burnout rou­tine, which appar­ently is not that much work, is it?


Next, learn the basics: Tool-agnostic GTD essentials by a decade-long practitioner.