On meritocracy

“…the root cause of which is pre­cisely unwor­thy people in power”

Ihor Shevchenko, “a future politi­cian of a new qual­ity”, shevchenko.ua

When people say this, it’s imme­di­ately clear that all we really need is to elect good people and life will sort itself out! Until now we’ve been elect­ing the wrong ones, but just elect decent, respon­si­ble patri­ots and every­thing will be hunky-dory!

The Meritocratic Party of Ukraine was offi­cially reg­is­tered by the Ministry of Justice of Ukraine on April 12, 2011, under No. 192.

http://m-p-u.org

Meritocracy is the idea that the right social order is one where the state is run by the best people, the smartest and most worthy: the intel­lec­tual elite of the nation (“nation” is the con­ven­tional word; I’d rather not use it).

At first glance the idea is very good. I held it myself some time ago. How great it would be if power were held not by these greedy, self­ish, dis­hon­est and gen­er­ally immoral politi­cians, but by altru­is­tic, highly intel­lec­tual, self­less people who want to serve their Country and People.

The prob­lem, in my view, isn’t who is in power. The prob­lem is that we entrust anyone with that kind of power at all.

We’ve fallen into a trap: we think we need to replace the people in gov­ern­ment to start living better. We invented elec­tions to change them more often than once a gen­er­a­tion… But chang­ing rulers often doesn’t help, and even does the opposite…

All the modern “-cracies” differ only in whom, accord­ing to their sup­port­ers, we should put on the throne and how that should happen.

Why do so few people ask: why, exactly, put anyone on that throne at all?

Why do people believe some­one absolutely must be put in charge, and want to feel the “strong hand” of a ruler on them­selves and, espe­cially, on their fellow cit­i­zens? I think the joke that only wankers need a strong hand is very much to the point here.

Maybe it comes from a lack of self-confidence, from the sense of imper­fec­tion every person feels and projects onto others. People are afraid of responsibility. People are afraid to make the deci­sions their lives, well-being, future and present depend on.

Why are they like this? Sorry, why are we like this?

If you’re respon­si­ble your­self, you can’t shift the blame onto damned bureau­crats, a tyrant tsar or greedy capitalists. You’ll have to answer for your­self and get what your brains, will and abil­i­ties were good for.

It may seem that I don’t like people, that I hold human­ity in con­tempt and am pes­simistic about its future. Not at all. Quite the opposite. It’s the sup­port­ers of mer­i­toc­racy and the other -cracies who con­sider most people dumb cattle that must be led by the very best, that is, by them…

Fear of respon­si­bil­ity is normal. The sense of your own imper­fec­tion even more so. To my mind, these aren’t neg­a­tive qual­i­ties, as it might seem. They’re prop­er­ties, fea­tures (I don’t know the right word) of human nature. They’re part of the beau­ti­ful Human, often part of what makes us dif­fer­ent from other animals.

Still, should fear of respon­si­bil­ity be laid into the foun­da­tion of soci­ety? Maybe it should rest on some­thing else?

Where will a soci­ety end up in which you can shift respon­si­bil­ity onto others?