On new forms of communication

What Twitter does: cas­trates brains down to “no more than 140 char­ac­ters”. Give it 3–4 years and the sen­tences in school essays will be the same

http://twitter.com/#!/vidall/status/23906911770386433

What Facebook does: deval­ues the mean­ing of the words friend and friendship

http://twitter.com/#!/vidall/status/23906501680697344

A very pop­u­lar opin­ion, and an offen­sive one.

Social net­works (we used to say “the inter­net”) and modern tech­nol­ogy in gen­eral really are chang­ing the ways people com­mu­ni­cate, and a lot.

The trou­ble is that, in my humble opin­ion, they enrich this communication.

Let’s think together about how tech­nol­ogy has devel­oped over the last few centuries. Communication, com­mu­ni­ca­tion and once more communication.

Telegraph, tele­phone, radio, tele­vi­sion → inter­net, blogs, social net­works, Skype and so on.

Sorry for the tech­no­log­i­cal jumble: the point isn’t the order they appeared in or exact definitions.

There are many more ways to com­mu­ni­cate now. Now we have friends in our LiveJournal feed, fol­low­ers on Twitter, friends on Facebook and VKontakte, and a lot more.

By the way, andrewdaf gave a telling answer on Formspring to what was appar­ently a robo-question, “If you could only read one mag­a­zine for the rest of your life, which would it be?”:

oh, I’d read my friends feed if I could

Just think: we’ve started talk­ing to our class­mates! Whom we’d oth­er­wise barely remember…

We can see the person we’re talk­ing to on the phone! Could you have imag­ined that 15 years ago?

Blogs are a sep­a­rate topic. The Davids are finally armed against the Goliaths. Read Reynolds.

Twitter helps strip ideas of their husk. Tweets don’t replace blog posts. They’re just one more way of pass­ing on information. Twitter is a short thought, a quick way to pass on a link, a mood or an emotion. It isn’t a replace­ment for blogs. It’s an addition.

Facebook and VKontakte help people meet and talk. They let people exchange a few words with lots of old and new acquain­tances with­out leav­ing home or work.

People often say there’s less face-to-face communication. I think it’s less only in rel­a­tive terms. That is, there’s more com­mu­ni­ca­tion and it’s more varied, and face-to-face is just one part of it. Cafés and clubs don’t seem to have gone bust…

Friendship. What is friend­ship the old way? A fic­ti­tious reli­a­bil­ity, cemented by the hours of lessons sat through together? We used to be friends with the people we hap­pened to grow up with, then study with, then, much less often but still, work with.

Now we’re friends with people who share our inter­ests and hobbies. Feel the dif­fer­ence? An ele­ment of con­scious choice. That’s what matters.

There’s a joke, I read it on Twitter, I think:

Facebook is the people you went to school with, and Twitter is the people you wish you’d gone to school with.

Old-style friend­ship is largely a geo­graph­i­cal notion. New-style friend­ship… How real it is remains to be argued.

Social net­works arm people. They enrich their lives with new forms of communication. With new knowledge. They widen the circle of acquain­tances → which means more information. People find jobs and their call­ing more easily. People share photos, thoughts, ideas. People pre­serve memory.

People orga­nize, protest, invent and dream.

Yes, all of this existed before! But now it’s easier, faster, cheaper, more pleas­ant and safer to do. And we’re doing it!

P.S. If you’re inter­ested, read more about the strength of weak ties in Gladwell. In The Tipping Point, for exam­ple, the chap­ter “The Law of the Few”, part 4.

P.P.S. My fairly recent post on the topic: “Young people used to be completely different!”