On the fight against smoking, and private property

The other day a poll did the rounds on Facebook asking whether smoking should be banned in cafés and bars. Most people voted “About time”, and that sad­dens me a lot. Let me try to explain why in a few words.

Modern soci­ety claims to be built on a few basic con­cepts, and one of them is the invi­o­la­bil­ity of pri­vate property.

Unfortunately, many people in the post-Soviet space, includ­ing those who con­sider them­selves pro­gres­sive and fight­ing against “the regime”, don’t fully under­stand what this pro­tec­tion of prop­erty actu­ally means.

A bar or a café is the pri­vate prop­erty of its owner. So if we claim to cham­pion its pro­tec­tion, we have to accept the owner’s right to set his own rules within his own property. And the only nec­es­sary and suf­fi­cient limit here is that it does no harm to others and forces noth­ing on them.

Dear friends! Is anyone forc­ing you to go to smoky bars? No! Smoking harms more than just the smoker? Maybe, but, I repeat, is anyone making you go to smoky bars and pas­sively harm your own health?

Many cafés have non-smoking rooms. Suppose a café is split into two halves, but one of them is always empty. What con­clu­sion will the owner come to?

Go to non-smoking places and reward them with your money: that way you’ll express your civic posi­tion far more effectively.

But if you demand that the state make café and bar owners ban smok­ing, you hand your prop­erty over to the state to do with as it pleases. And then don’t be sur­prised when com­rades in uni­form (from the “Maski Show” comedy troupe, as post-Soviet slang calls masked raids) come to your home or office with­out any grounds at all and take what­ever they like. You allowed them to do it your­selves! Only you allowed them to do it to your neigh­bor, and it will come back to you too.